Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-04-28 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1323 SB 103 The following, which was held in second reading and returned to the Rules Committee (page 993), was again before the House: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 103(FIN) "An Act relating to election campaigns and legislative ethics." Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting HCS CSSB 103(FIN) (page 964). There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 103(FIN) which had been read a second time (page 963) was again before the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 103(2d RLS) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Halcro: Page 9, line 24, following "others;": Insert "or" Page 9, line 25, through page 10, line 1: Delete "; or 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1324 (G) reasonable use of governmental resources by a legislator or legislative employee to support or oppose a proposed amendment to the state or federal constitution; a legislator or legislative employee may support or oppose a proposed constitutional amendment; however, a legislator or legislative employee may not use governmental resources to solicit or receive contributions for a proposed constitutional amendment" Representative Halcro moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Bunde objected. SB 103 The following was again before the House with Amendment No. 1 moved and pending: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 103(2d RLS) "An Act relating to election campaigns and legislative ethics." Representative Halcro moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. New Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Halcro: Page 9, line 26: Delete "reasonable" Insert "incidental" 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1325 Page 9, line 27: Delete "or legislative employee" Page 9, line 28 - 29: Delete "or legislative employee" Representative Halcro moved and asked unanimous consent that New Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, New Amendment No. 1 was divided. New Amendment No. 1 - Part A: Page 9, line 26: Delete "reasonable" Insert "incidental" Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall New Amendment No. 1 - Part A be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) Second Reading New Amendment No. 1 - Part A YEAS: 22 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Stevens 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1326 Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Fate, Foster, James, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Mulder, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kookesh And so, New Amendment No. 1 - Part A was adopted. New Amendment No. 1 - Part B: Page 9, line 27: Delete "or legislative employee" Page 9, line 28 - 29: Delete "or legislative employee" The question being: "Shall New Amendment No. 1 - Part B be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H Second Reading New Amendment No. 1 - Part B YEAS: 11 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Guess, Halcro, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Meyer, Murkowski Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kookesh And so, New Amendment No. 1 - Part B was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative James: Page 2, lines 8 through 11, following "section.": Delete all material. 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1327 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Davies objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Coghill, James, Masek, Meyer, Moses, Porter, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, McGuire, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Kookesh Absent: Bunde, Foster, Lancaster And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Representative Berkowitz objected. The Speaker stated that HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H will advance to third reading on the April 29, 2001, calendar.